All Comments

Comments on the Pages

  • 37-41 (3 comments)

    • Comment by Giles Gilbert on January 15, 2015

      Is Cicero criticising Lucullus here? Or is the reference too vague? Would Lucullus be angry? Or would he think Cicero was talking about other commanders?

      Comment by Claire Webster on April 22, 2015

      Is this supposed to say ‘weirdo form’ or is it an autocorrect for ‘verb form’?!

      Comment by Claire Webster on April 22, 2015

      I’m guessing the smiley face is an autocorrect for 🙂

  • Introduction (1 comment)

    • Comment by Roko on July 6, 2022

      Cicero was biased against Sulla, this was clear since the ancient times.

  • 40 (1 comment)

    • Comment by Lulu Gray on March 16, 2015

      The anaphora is clearly seen here but what is the effect of this? Is it to show the independence of Gnaeus Pompeius?

  • Chronological table: the parallel lives of Pompey and Cicero (1 comment)

    • Comment by John Whelpton on April 11, 2015

      A useful summary but why no mention of the `1st Triumvirate’ with Crassus and Caesar?  Although this was not a legally-sanctioned body (in contrast to the `2nd. triumvirate’) it did exercise de facto control of the Roman state whilst it held together.

  • Translation of §§ 27-49 (1 comment)

    • Comment by S Mkje on September 27, 2015

      the army of the ‘greatest’ general is more appropriate than ‘perfect’

Comments on the Blog

  • Hello world! (1 comment)

    • Comment by Anonymous on November 2, 2014

Source: https://deimperio.theclassicslibrary.com/all-comments/